Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTassis, Georgios
dc.contributor.authorRønning, Jan Steinar
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Louise
dc.contributor.authorTønnesen, Jan Fredrik
dc.coverage.spatial13181 Stryn
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-15T07:24:30Z
dc.date.available2020-07-15T07:24:30Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0800-3416
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2664366
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this report is to document the results of a comparative performance test between systems and antennas from two major GPR manufacturers namely Sensors & Software (S&S) from Canada and Malå from Sweden. The Malå RTA system utilizes a parallel endfire antenna configuration which facilitates measurements in rugged terrains as opposed to the bulky S&S perpendicular broadside mode equipment (PulseEKKO) which requires a relatively open terrain to operate. To carry out our tests, conversion of the S&S system to parallel endfire mode was required as well as measuring with Malå equipment on perpendicular broadside antenna configuration. Penetration depth and overall data quality was our main focus.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNGU-Rapport (2015.014)
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no
dc.subjectGEOFYSIKK
dc.subjectGEORADAR
dc.subjectGEOFYSISK METODE
dc.subjectELEKTROMAGNETISK MÅLING
dc.titleComparison between Sensors and Software and Malå GPR equipment based on test measurements at Bøaøyna, Stryn Municipality, Norway
dc.typeReport
dc.description.localcode63336
dc.source.pagenumber41
dc.relation.project(358000) Publisering av eldre data, Anvendt geofysikk


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal