dc.contributor.author | Tassis, Georgios | |
dc.contributor.author | Rønning, Jan Steinar | |
dc.contributor.author | Hansen, Louise | |
dc.contributor.author | Tønnesen, Jan Fredrik | |
dc.coverage.spatial | 13181 Stryn | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-15T07:24:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-15T07:24:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0800-3416 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2664366 | |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this report is to document the results of a comparative performance test between systems and antennas from two major GPR manufacturers namely Sensors & Software (S&S) from Canada and Malå from Sweden. The Malå RTA system utilizes a parallel endfire antenna configuration which facilitates measurements in rugged terrains as opposed to the bulky S&S perpendicular broadside mode equipment (PulseEKKO) which requires a relatively open terrain to operate. To carry out our tests, conversion of the S&S system to parallel endfire mode was required as well as measuring with Malå equipment on perpendicular broadside antenna configuration. Penetration depth and overall data quality was our main focus. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | NGU-Rapport (2015.014) | |
dc.rights | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no | |
dc.subject | GEOFYSIKK | |
dc.subject | GEORADAR | |
dc.subject | GEOFYSISK METODE | |
dc.subject | ELEKTROMAGNETISK MÅLING | |
dc.title | Comparison between Sensors and Software and Malå GPR equipment based on test measurements at Bøaøyna, Stryn Municipality, Norway | |
dc.type | Report | |
dc.description.localcode | 63336 | |
dc.source.pagenumber | 41 | |
dc.relation.project | (358000) Publisering av eldre data, Anvendt geofysikk | |