Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBjørlykke, Knut O.
dc.coverage.spatial19144 Oslo
dc.coverage.spatial18161 Gjøvik
dc.coverage.spatial19164 Hamar
dc.coverage.spatialGAUSDAL
dc.coverage.spatialINNLANDET
dc.coverage.spatialGJØVIK
dc.coverage.spatialRINGSAKER
dc.coverage.spatialOSLO
dc.coverage.spatialOSLO
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-26T13:20:59Z
dc.date.available2020-08-26T13:20:59Z
dc.date.issued1904
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2675118
dc.description.abstractForkortet: The author replies to Dr.Kiær's remarks. (This yearbook 1904, No.5) on his description of the Upper Silurian in the Brumunddal region (1904, No.2). He points out, that Dr.Kiær has made no new observations, and that his reasoning is purely theoretical and not very convincing.
dc.language.isonor
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNGU (37)
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no
dc.subjectKALKSTEIN
dc.subjectFOSSIL
dc.subjectSTRATIGRAFI
dc.subjectPETROGRAFI
dc.subjectSEDIMENTÆR BERGART
dc.titleEt kort tilsvar til dr. J.Kiærs bemærkninger om oversilurien i Brumunddalen
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.localcode36044
dc.source.pagenumber7


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Artikler [1063]
    Artikler fra seriene NGU, NGU Bulletin og NGU Skrifter

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal